Assignment Paper-E-C-3204
Topic- Computer Assisted Language Learning
Dabhi Ashvin P
M.A. Part – II
SEM- IV
Roll No -06
Year – 2011-12
Department of English
Submitted to Dr. Dilip Barad
Department of English,
Introduction: -
Nowadays computer is used in various aspects. Without using of computer we can not do many things very effectively. Computer is widely useful tool. There is no any field that is run without computer. With the help of computer the work is done very carefully and perfectly. Computers have become so widespread in schools, homes; colleges etc. and their uses have expanded so dramatically. Now the majority of language teachers must begin to think about the involvement of computers for language learning. Here I try to mention that how computers have been used and are being used for language teaching. This assignment focuses not on a technical description of hardware and software, but rather on the pedagogical questions that teachers have considered in using computers in the classroom.
Meaning of CALL:-
Computer assisted language learning is a process in which a learner uses a computer and, as a result, improves his or her language. Though this definition might seem unworkably, it at least encompasses a broad spectrum of current practice in the teaching and learning of language at the computer. An awareness of this spectrum allows learners and researchers to recognize appropriate materials and methodologies and adapt others to various technologies and learning style.
CALL is an amorphous or unstructured discipline because of the changing nature of computers. Changing nature of computers is evolving both in terms of pedagogy and technological advances in hardware and software. Change is also occurring with some advances in computer literary among both teachers and learners. CALL is employed in many ways, both in and out of the classroom. In some commercial applications meant to be used by individuals away from the home. It is promoted as a complete method of learning a language. It can be used both as a reward for better learners or a remedial tool for weaker ones in classrooms. Some language labs integrate CALL and some teachers use CALL activities based on emails and the World Wide Web to supplement student learning.
Computer based language learning tools will become both pervasive and invisible. They will be commonly included in other applications and computer interfaces will become almost completely intuitive. Through computer software learner can able to recognize and intelligence respond to speech. Computer based language functions are already integrated into world processing and other software that corrects spelling and grammar.
History of CALL:-
Advances in technology have made some parts of early books on CALL irrelevant. Entire books have been discarded by publishers and valuable information lost except to those able to access university library collections. It is important to preserve such history not just to give a sense of ensure that researchers do not overlook earlier issues and developments and waste time reinventing the wheel.
The first computers used for language learning were large 1950s’ mainframes that were only available at research facilities on university campuses. These presented particular organizational problems as learners had to leave classroom and travel to a computer. There was the high cost of computers so the process of reaching and learning was limited. At that time parallel research also took place on subjects such as machine translation. The first CALL programs created at three pioneering institutions: Stanford University, Dartmouth University and The University of Essex. All these universities focused on the teaching of Russian.
Neuwirth and Koufer’s description of research in CALL is still much practiced but it is of waning interest. A focus of much research in the early years of CALL whether or not computers should be used in the presence of computers in educational context has grown from a single unit in one or more classrooms to computer labs and even to widespread individual ownership by students in some countries.
In 1959 PLATO system was developed by the University of Illinois working with a business partner, control Data Corporation. PLATO system means programmed learning for Automated Teaching Operations. It is the first and most significant applications for the teaching and learning of language at the computer. This PLATO system combined some of the best CALL features being developed at other universities but different from many other attempts to use computers to teach language in that PLATO’s computer and its programming language were custom designed for the purpose of teaching language. PLATO’s first language learning work was done in teaching a grammar translation approach. Russian language teaching and learning included grammar explanations, vocabulary drills and other drills and translation tests over a course of sixteen lessons. The system had so called ‘intelligent’ features still used today.
In 1975, microcomputers were first sold in kit form. High-end main frame computers continued to be available and used for CALL research throughout the 1970s and 1980s at university laboratories and commercial institutions. The format has been largely replaced with Compact Disk Read-only Memory as they have a greater installed base in personal computers and feature that is smaller. CD-ROMs are likely replaced by learner volume media such as Digital Videodiscs (DVD).
Gale describes Macario as an early videodisc program for learning Spanish. It was developed at Brigham Young University. Then Gale mentions two similar videodisc programs that featured non linear opportunities for learning, Montevidisco and Interactive Digame, these two programs pioneered the idea of learners making greater choices about what is to be learned at the computer.
In 1984, Apple computer introduced a new style of compute, the Macintosh. It differed from earlier domestic use or personal computers in that it offered a graphical user interface. Thousands of new CALL programs have been published since the few mentioned above, but the ones cited so far provide an overview of the types of CALL environment. Morgenstern and Furstenberg provide guidelines as to what might be usefully included in multi media learning environment.
Three Phases of CALL:-
Though CALL has developed gradually over the last some years, this development can be categorized in terms of three somewhat distinct phases like Behaviouristic CALL, Communicative CALL and Integrative CALL.
(1) Behaviouristic CALL:-
The first phase of CALL conceived in the 1950s and implemented in the 1960s and 70s was based on the dominant behaviorist theories of learning. Programs of this phase entailed repetitive language drills and can be referred to as ‘drill and practice’. Drill and practice courseware is based on the model of computer as tutor. In other words the computer serves as a vehicle for delivering instructional materials to the student. The rationale behind drill and practice was not totally spurious, which explains in part the fact that CALL drills are still used today. There are some rationale is as follows: first is Repeated exposure to the same material is beneficial or even essential to learning, second is A computer is ideal for carrying out repeated drills, since the machine does not get bored with presenting the same material and since it can provide immediate non judgmental feedback and third is A computer can present such material on an individualized basis, allowing students to proceed at their own pace and freeing up class time for other activities.
A number of CALL tutoring systems were developed for the mainframe which was used at that time. One of the most sophisticated of these was the PLATO system. The PLATO system included drills, brief grammar explanations and drills, and translations tests at various intervals. In the late 1970s and early 1980s behavioristic CALL was undermined by two important factors. First, behavioristics approaches to language learning had been rejected at both the theoretical and the pedagogical level. Secondly, the introduction of the microcomputer allowed a whole new range of possibilities. The stage was set for a new phase of CALL.
(2) Communicative CALL:-
The second phase of CALL was based on the communicative approach to teaching which became prominent in the 1970s and 80s. Communicative CALL focuses more on using forms rather than on the forms themselves. It teaches grammar implicitly rather than explicitly. It allows and encourages students to generate original utterances rather than just manipulate prefabricated language. It avoids telling students they are wrong and is flexible to a variety of student’s responses.
Several types of CALL programs were developed and used during this the phase of communicative CALL. First, there was a variety of programs to provide skill practice, but in a non drill format. In addition to computer as tutor, another CALL model used for communicative activities involves the computer as stimulus. The third model of computers in communicative CALL involves the computer as tool. In this role, the programs do not necessarily provide any language material at all. The challenges for advocates of CALL were to developed models which could help integrate the various aspects of the language learning process.
(3) Integrative CALL:-
Integrative approaches to CALL are based on two important technological developments of the last decade multimedia computers and the internet. Hypermedia provides a number of advantages for language learning. The major advantage of hypermedia is that it facilitates a principle focus on the content without sacrificing a secondary focus on language form or learning strategies. There is the question of quality of available programs. While teachers themselves can develop their own multimedia programs using authoring software, the fact is that most classroom teachers lack the training or to make even simple programs. Multimedia technology as it currently exists thus only partially contributes to integrative CALL. Using multimedia may involve an integration of skills but it too seldom involves a more important type of integration. Another technological breakthrough is helping make that possible – electronic communication and the Internet.
Conclusion:-
The history of CALL suggests that the computer can serve a variety of uses for language teaching. It can be a tutor which offers language drills or skill practice. It also offers a stimulus for discussion and interaction. With the advance of the Internet, it can also be a medium of global communication and a source of limitless authentic materials. The effectiveness of CALL cannot reside in the medium itself but only in how it is put to use.